Current:Home > reviewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -TradeWisdom
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-13 11:42:51
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (5556)
Related
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- Plans To Dig the Biggest Lithium Mine in the US Face Mounting Opposition
- YouTuber Grace Helbig Diagnosed With Breast Cancer
- Inside Clean Energy: Who’s Ahead in the Race for Offshore Wind Jobs in the US?
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Inside Clean Energy: For Offshore Wind Energy, Bigger is Much Cheaper
- Consumer safety regulators adopt new rules to prevent dresser tip-overs
- Warming Trends: Chilling in a Heat Wave, Healthy Food Should Eat Healthy Too, Breeding Delays for Wild Dogs, and Three Days of Climate Change in Song
- Sam Taylor
- He 'Proved Mike Wrong.' Now he's claiming his $5 million
Ranking
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- And Just Like That, Sarah Jessica Parker Shares Her Candid Thoughts on Aging
- The Chevy Bolt, GM's popular electric vehicle, is on its way out
- NBC's late night talk show staff get pay and benefits during writers strike
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- When the Power Goes Out, Who Suffers? Climate Epidemiologists Are Now Trying to Figure That Out
- SVB, now First Republic: How it all started
- Our final thoughts on the influencer industry
Recommendation
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
How to fight a squatting goat
Eastwind Books, an anchor for the SF Bay Area's Asian community, shuts its doors
Step up Your Fashion With the Top 17 Trending Amazon Styles Right Now
Could your smelly farts help science?
Bethany Hamilton Welcomes Baby No. 4, Her First Daughter
Khloe Kardashian Says She Hates Being in Her 30s After Celebrating 39th Birthday
Lead Poisonings of Children in Baltimore Are Down, but Lead Contamination Still Poses a Major Threat, a New Report Says